National Institute Of Health REJECTIONS of Linus Pauling's Request on a Technicality

I thought I would just post a letter from 1998 of a rejection based on a technicality of requesting a study of Linus Pauling's formula for heart disease.

Here is a reprint of the letter rejecting the study from the NIH: (CLICK on the 1998 study proposal and again on the 2002 study proposal) Hopefully the links will work for you.

Dan

NIH Refuses to Study Pauling/Rath Therapy

The Pauling therapy is simple. Take high doses of two nutrients that are required for life. Doing so can prevent and even cure many forms of cardiovascular and heart disease - in days or weeks. The question becomes how much should one take? 

We, under the auspices of the Vitamin C Foundation, submitted two study proposals to the United States National Institutes of Health, (NIH) Office of Alternative Medicine. We were inexperienced in submitting such proposals, but the NIH was free to solicit its own studies. Either proposal would have fairly evaluated the Pauling therapy on heart disease.

• The 2002 Study Proposal
• The 1998 Study Propoasl

These submissions (and subsequent rejections) are a matter of public record. 

Probably the main reason that this important discovery has been ignored is economic:Think of more than half the hospitals in your region closing. 

With medical science asleep at the switch, we have been promoting and closely monitoring the effect of Pauling's therapy on heart patients for almost twenty years. [10]One thing has become crystal clear: The large doses recommended by Linus Pauling are key to success [11] [12]. Neither nutrient has any known lethal toxic dose in animal or human studies. 

The reports have been so amazing that we documented the protocol and success stories in a book Practicing Medicine Without A Licence. 

This long-term experience, (initially with dying heart patients who gave up on orthodox medicine and were taking a myriad of heart medications), leaves little doubt that :Cardiovascular (Heart) disease at its root is a vitamin C deficiency. Science can not dispute this assertion because it has never been tested at Pauling's recommended dosages. 

So why after all these years and so many reports of success does medical research still have its collective head in the sand? We can only think of one reason:

The method for reversing heart disease invented by Linus Pauling does not require a doctor.

The suppression Continues...

[Be patient... graphics take some time to load ]

The Vitamin C Foundation submitted a serious research proposal to the United States National Institute of Health (NIH), for the Office of Alternative Medicine (OAM,) on February 1, 1998 to study the late scientist Linus Pauling's claim of a cure for occlusive heart disease. The proposal, was returned March 11, 1998 without scientific review on a technicality.